Policy incentives often fall into two traps—too broad or too blind. They either subsidize everything and everyone or build bureaucratic mazes no one wants to navigate.
PLI changed that.
Launched as part of India’s push to become a global manufacturing powerhouse, Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes flipped the usual script. It wasn’t about inputs. It wasn’t about intent. It was about outcomes. Tangible, measurable, export-worthy outcomes.
What’s the Real Problem PLI Solved?
India had no shortage of industrial policies. But something was always missing:
We rewarded capacity, not production.
We subsidized capex, not competitiveness.
We ignored scale, especially in tech-heavy sectors.
This led to half-baked manufacturing. Plants that existed on paper. Schemes that went underutilized. And a steady stream of imports—phones, chips, solar panels, medical devices.
PLI addressed this by tying cash incentives directly to incremental production. If you produce and sell more than your baseline, you get paid. Simple.
It’s not a loan. It’s not equity. It’s performance-based cash.
Core Design of PLI: How It Works
At the heart of the PLI scheme is a simple mechanism:
You manufacture more, and the government rewards you with 4%–6% of the incremental sales (over a base year) for a fixed period.
But behind that simplicity lies a robust targeting framework:
Only specific high-impact sectors are selected.
Baseline year is fixed (typically FY2019–20 or FY2020–21).
Incentive slabs and eligibility thresholds are clearly defined.
Export potential and import substitution are prioritized.
No scope for ambiguity. No room for freeloading.
Sectors Under PLI: Focused, Not Scattered
Instead of being everything for everyone, PLI focuses on 14 priority sectors—each chosen for strategic reasons:
Mobile and electronics manufacturing
Pharmaceuticals and APIs
Telecom and networking products
Food processing
White goods (ACs and LEDs)
Textile and technical textiles
Specialty steel
High-efficiency solar PV modules
Advanced chemistry cell batteries
Drones and drone components
Medical devices
Automotive and auto components
Semiconductors and display fabs
IT hardware
Each of these sectors either faced heavy import dependence or had large-scale export potential—or both.
PLI Is Not a Policy. It’s a Business Model.
Let’s be clear—PLI doesn’t fund businesses. It funds performance.
If you don’t produce, you get nothing. If you scale production, you earn rewards. The upside is directly tied to real manufacturing output.
This is why global players—from Apple to Samsung, Bosch to Foxconn, Vedanta to Tata—have lined up for PLI.
It de-risks expansion, but only if you can deliver.
For the government, it ensures every rupee spent creates real value—jobs, exports, tech capabilities, and tax revenue.
Mobile Manufacturing: PLI’s Poster Child
Before PLI, 98% of the phones sold in India were imported. Today, India is exporting iPhones.
How?
Apple shifted significant iPhone assembly to India through its contract manufacturers (Foxconn, Pegatron, Wistron).
Samsung set up its largest mobile factory in Noida.
Domestic players like Lava and Dixon expanded operations.
The numbers speak:
Mobile exports crossed ₹90,000 crore in FY2023.
India became the 2nd largest phone manufacturer globally.
Job creation and ecosystem depth expanded significantly.
This isn’t accidental. It’s PLI in motion.
Pharma and Medical Devices: From Importer to Competitor
India had the pharma talent but imported 60–70% of APIs (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients). That was a red flag.
PLI for pharma focused on:
Backward integration for key starting materials
Incentivizing domestic API and KSM production
Supporting innovation in formulations and bio-pharma
Similarly, PLI for medical devices is shifting India from import-dependent to device exporter. It’s also boosting domestic R&D in diagnostics, imaging, and consumables.
EV and Battery: Betting on the Future
PLI is not just about fixing yesterday’s problems. It’s about pre-empting tomorrow’s opportunities.
Electric mobility and energy storage are two such bets:
Automotive PLI supports EVs, fuel cell vehicles, and advanced auto components.
Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) PLI targets giga-scale battery manufacturing.
The result? Indian and global players have committed to set up giga factories, creating new supply chains, jobs, and export opportunities in sectors that didn’t exist here five years ago.
Semiconductors: The Boldest Gamble Yet
PLI for semiconductors and display fabs isn’t cheap. It’s risky. But it’s necessary.
Semiconductors are the backbone of every modern device. India missed this bus in the last tech wave. This time, the aim is different:
Set up domestic fabs (fabrication units)
Support packaging and testing facilities (ATMP/OSAT)
Encourage design-led manufacturing
This isn’t just about chips. It’s about strategic independence.
Outcomes That Matter: Where We Stand
PLI is a long-term game. But early wins are visible:
₹3.5 lakh crore+ investment committed
60 lakh+ new jobs (direct + indirect) projected
Sharp rise in exports across electronics, pharma, and textiles
Shift in global supply chains—India is being considered as a China+1 destination
Manufacturing as a share of GDP is inching toward the 20% target
And most importantly: MSMEs are being pulled into value chains through anchor-led PLI projects.
What Makes PLI Work: Beyond the Incentives
PLI succeeds because it aligns:
Private sector incentives (profits)
National goals (exports, jobs, strategic control)
Global trends (de-risking from China, ESG manufacturing)
It’s also not a one-size-fits-all scheme. Each sector’s PLI has been designed with input from industry. That agility is critical.
What Needs Tightening
No policy is perfect. PLI has its weak spots too.
1. Execution Speed
Approvals can still take months. Disbursement bottlenecks exist. State-level infra isn’t always aligned. Timelines need sharper enforcement.
2. Depth Over Surface
Some sectors risk becoming assembly hubs unless deeper value chains are developed—like components, tooling, or sub-systems.
PLI must evolve to reward depth of manufacturing, not just final assembly.
3. MSME Participation
Large players dominate PLI allocations. While that’s strategic, MSMEs need more targeted support to integrate into supply chains—especially in textiles, food processing, and components.
PLI 2.0: What the Future Demands
To stay relevant, PLI needs evolution. Here’s where it could head next:
Green Manufacturing PLI: Reward companies for building sustainable, low-carbon supply chains.
Deeptech Manufacturing PLI: For AI chips, quantum devices, and advanced sensors.
Services + Manufacturing Convergence: For sectors like medtech, defence tech, and agri-tech.
The playbook is in place. The focus now must shift to execution, flexibility, and continuous feedback.
Final Word: PLI Isn’t a Shortcut. It’s a Catalyst.
India’s manufacturing dreams won’t come true through slogans. They need capital, confidence, and competition.
PLI is the first policy in a long time that respects market principles while solving for national goals. It doesn’t throw money around. It makes companies earn every rupee by producing, selling, and scaling.
And in doing so, it builds something far more valuable than factories—it builds conviction.
If Make in India was the vision, PLI is the engine. And that engine is just getting warmed up.
Relevant URLs for further reading:
Read about Make in India - here
Got more questions about Indian government processes and schemes? Ask Jaankaar Bharat below
Made with Superblog